Trending Topic

23 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Luke G Qin, Michael T Pierce, Rachel C Robbins

The uvea is a vascular stratum that includes the iris, ciliary body and choroid. Uveitis is defined as inflammation of a part of the uvea or its entirety, but it is also used to describe inflammatory processes of any part of the eye, such as the vitreous or peripheral retina. The clinical taxonomy of uveitis […]

Surgery for Myopic Macular Hole Without Retinal Detachment

Jose Garcia-Arumi, Anna Boixadera, Vicente Martinez-Castillo, Miguel Angel Zapata, Carme Macià
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Aug 5th 2012 European Ophthalmic Review, 2012;6(4):204-7 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/EOR.2012.06.04.204
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

The purpose of this paper is to review the indications, surgical technique and surgical outcome of myopic macular holes (MHs). In myopic MH, the use of optical coherence tomography has been very useful both in the diagnosis and follow-up after surgery due to the difficulty in biomicroscopic diagnosis in high myopes. Myopic MH surgery is more difficult than idiopathic MH surgery due to the increased axial length, retinal pigment epithelium and choroidal atrophy, and thinner retina making internal limiting membrane and posterior hyaloidstaining more important. Myopic MH vitreoretinal surgery achieves comparable anatomical success rates when compared with idiopathic MHs except in cases with posterior staphyloma and axial lengths equal to or over 30 mm where a macular buckle may be needed. The closure of myopic MH decreases the risk of retinal detachment secondary to MH.

Keywords

Myopic macular hole, pars plana vitrectomy, optical coherence tomography, high myopia, foveoschisis, internal limiting membrane peeling, macular buckle

2

Article

Asymptomatic Myopic Macular Hole
Secondary macular hole (MH) can occur in eyes with high myopia and the characteristics and demographics of these MHs differ from those of most idiopathic holes. Myopic MHs tend to develop in younger subjects and may be associated with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surrounding the hole.1 The mean age of patients in most myopic MH series is mid-fifties, whereas the mean age in idiopathic MH series is the upper sixties. The earlier onset of myopic MHs may be related to abnormal vitreomacular traction in myopic eyes, premature vitreous liquefaction, or other unknown factors predisposing these eyes to premature MHs – there is a predominance in women. The diagnosis may be difficult because of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroidal atrophy. Biomicroscopic diagnosis of MH in highly myopic eyes without retinal detachment is sometimes difficult. This could be due to a lack of contrast between the MH and RPE, particularly in the presence of a deep posterior staphyloma and severe chorioretinal atrophy. In asymptomatic myopic eyes with good vision, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has revealed the presence of MH.2 Asymptomatic MH is more prevalent in eyes with higher degrees of myopia and pronounced posterior staphyloma. In the authors’ experience of macular examination with optical coherence tomography in severely myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma, the authors have found that retinal detachment, retinoschisis, or both, are often seen at the fovea, suggesting that foveal retinal detachment may precede the onset of MH formation. Also, in these patients apparent complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) confirmed by biomicroscopy does not prevent vitreous remnants adhering to theretina, since vitreoschisis and a posterior vitreous cortex adherence has been found to persist. It may also be preceded by a foveal detachmentcausing the fovea to become extremely thin.

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Morita H, Ideta H, Ito K, et al., Causative factors of
    retinal detachment in macular holes, Retina,
    1991;11(3):281–4.

  2. Coppé AM, Ripanelli G, Parisi V, et al., Prevalence of
    asymptomatic macular holes in highly myopic eyes,
    Ophthalmology, 2005;112(12):2103–9.

  3. Tano Y, Pathologic myopia: where are we now?,
    Am J Ophthalmol, 2002;134(5):645–60.

  4. Baba T, Ohno-Matsui K, Futagami S, et al., Prevalence and
    characteristics of foveal retinal detachment without
    macular hole in high myopia, Am J Ophthalmol,
    2003;135(3):338–42.

  5. Takano M, Kishi S, Foveal retinoschisis and retinal
    detachment in severely myopic eyes with posterior
    staphyloma, Am J Ophthalmol, 1999;128(4):472–6.

  6. Gaucher D, Haouchine D, Tadayoni R, et al., Long-term
    follow-up of high myopic foveoschisis: natural course and
    surgical outcome, Am J Ophthalmol, 2007;143(3):455–62.

  7. Kobayashi H, Kishi S, Vitreous surgery for highly myopic eyes
    with foveal detachment and retinoschisis, Ophthalmology,
    2003;110(9):1702–7.

  8. García-Arumí J, Martinez V, Puig J, Corcostegui B, The role
    of vitreoretinal surgery in the management of myopic
    macular hole without retinal detachment, Retina,
    2001;21(4):332–8.

  9. Curtin BJ, The myopias: basic science and clinical management,
    Philadelphia, US: Harper and Row, 1985.

  10. Rodrigues EB, Meyer CH, Mennel S, Farah ME, Mechanisms
    of intravitreal toxicity of indocyanine gren dye: implications
    for chromovitrectomy, Retina, 2007;27:958–70.

  11. Kwok AK, Lai TY, Yip WW, Vitrectomy and gas tamponade
    wihout internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic
    foveoschisis, Br J Ophthalmol, 2005;89:1180–3.

  12. Patel SC, Loo RH, Thompson JT, Sjaarda RN, Macular
    hole surgery in high myopia, Ophthalmology,
    2001;108(2):377–80.

  13. Sulkes DJ, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW, Feuer W, Outcomes
    of macular hole surgery in severely myopic eyes: a
    case-control study, Am J Ophthalmol, 2000;130(3):335–9.

  14. Park SS, Marcus DM, Duker JS, et al., Posterior segment
    complications after vitrectomy for macular hole,
    Ophthalmology, 1995;102(5):775–81.

  15. Kadonosono K, Yazama F, Itoh N, et al., Treatment of retinal
    detachment resulting from myopic macular hole with
    internal limiting membrane removal, Am J Ophthalmol,
    2001;131(2):203–7.

  16. Kumar A, Wagh VB, Prakash G, et al., Visual outcome
    and electron microscopic features of indocyanine
    green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling from
    macular hole of various aetiologies, Indian J Ophthalmol,
    2005;53(3):159–65.

  17. Sayanagi K, Morimoto Y, Ikuno Y, Tano Y, Spectral-domain
    optical coherence findings in myopic foveoschisis, Retina,
    2010;30:623–8.

  18. Suda K, Hangai M, Yoshimura N, Axial length and outcomes
    of macular hole surgery assessed by spectral-domain
    optical coherence tomography, Am J Ophthalmol,
    2011;151:118–27.e1.

  19. Kobayashi H, Kobayashi K, Okinami S, Macular hole and
    myopic refraction, Br J Ophthalmol, 2002;86:1269–73.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Jose Garcia-Arumi, Department of Ophthalmology, Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular, C/ Josep Maria Lladó no 3, 08002, Barcelona, Spain. E: 17215jga@comb.es

Received

2011-10-11T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup