Trending Topic

23 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Luke G Qin, Michael T Pierce, Rachel C Robbins

The uvea is a vascular stratum that includes the iris, ciliary body and choroid. Uveitis is defined as inflammation of a part of the uvea or its entirety, but it is also used to describe inflammatory processes of any part of the eye, such as the vitreous or peripheral retina. The clinical taxonomy of uveitis […]

Ocular Surface Disorders and Cataract and Refractive Surgery Success

Carlos Vergés
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Jun 21st 2013 European Ophthalmic Review, 2013;7(1):28–30 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/EOR.2013.07.01.28
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Many ophthalmologists stress the importance to success of considering the state of the ocular surface in cataract and refractive surgery. The problem is that surgeons do not always attach the same required attention and there is not a well-defined protocol for diagnosis and treatment of ocular surface disorders. This article aims to highlight these facts and provide a guide, both simple and practical, for both diagnosis and for treatment.

Keywords

Dry eye, ocular surface disorders, meibomian gland dysfunction, refractive surgery, cataract surgery, diagnosis, treatment

2

Article

Dry eye syndrome (DES) is a multifactorial ocular surface disease (OSD),1–3 the incidence of which is about 16 %,4–7 and is one of the most common reasons why people visit their ophthalmologist – approximately one in three patients seek treatment from a specialist.8

Many cases of dry eye are associated with other disorders such as meibomian gland disease (MGD), conjunctivochalasis or even allergy. Recently, the International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS)1 and the Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Workshop9 redefined these conditions. It is relevant and somewhat novel that in both definitions, DES and MGD, inflammation appears as a major factor in the pathogenesis. This will be important in providing a more definitive approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Cataract or refractive surgery often aggravate the symptoms of DES,11 and there is evidence to show how these patients have poorer outcomes after surgery.11 In patients with DES undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery, a worsening of symptoms or onset of discomfort in patients who were previously asymptomatic,12 or even a reduction of functional visual acuity,13 have been described.

We also know that MGD is the most prevalent cause of evaporative dry eye.14 Pre-existing MGD can double a patient’s risk of developing DES,15 especially after ocular surgery, which can negatively affect outcomes.15–19

For these reasons it is important for ophthalmologists to consider DES and OSD whenever they approach surgical patients in order to identify and treat these conditions pre-operatively and thus optimise surgical outcomes.

Diagnosis
Traditional tests to diagnose OSD provide limited practical information.20 Fortunately this has changed recently and the combination of clinical history, subjective symptoms and, especially, data provided by new technologies, help us with a given diagnosis. We emphasise the value of the patient’s clinical history. The presence of other diseases, ocular and systemic, as well as certain medications are fundamental factors in the onset and course of the disease.

According to the DEWS report, risk factors for dry eye to be taken in account before surgery include:

  • Increasing age;
  • Female gender, especially women who are post-menopausal and taking oestrogen;
  • Deficiencies of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids and vitamin A;
  • Oral medications, including antihistamines, betablockers, tricyclic antidepressants and diuretics;
  • Topical medications, especially those containing preservatives, such as benzalkonium chloride;
  • Systemic diseases, namely autoimmune disease, including Sjögren syndrome and diabetes;
  • Ocular surgery, in particular, laser vision correction and cataract surgery, especially when limbal relaxing incisions are used; and
  • Stem-cell transplantation, especially when graft versus host disease occurs.

To achieve a complete approach to OSD, diagnosis should include a standardised questionnaire, such as the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI); McMonnies; Schein; Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ); Ocular Comfort Index (OCI); or the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED), followed by non-invasive objective testing. New technologies include:

  • New corneal topography: measure tear break-up time and tear meniscus height objectively (Keratograph, Oculus).
  • New optical coherence tomography (Fourier domain OCT) objectively quantifies the tear meniscus height and volume.
  • Dynamic Wavefront aberrometry (the Oral Controlled Absorption System [OCAS]) measures the inter-blink change in higher-order aberrations and, thus, provides a quantitative assessment of tear-film quality and stability.
  • Corneal interferometry measures the lipid layer of the tear fllm providing useful information on the functional status of Meibomian gland.
  • Meibography can visualise meibomian glands (see Figure 1) using new topography measures with infrared light and high-resolution images (Keratograph 5M, Oculus, Arlington, WA, US).
  • Confocal microscopy can show inflammation at the cellular level. Researchers have used it to view the ductal changes that occur in MGD.21
  • Tear Osmolarity. Tear hyperosmolarity and the resultant inflammation is a main mechanism in the OSD cycle. Studies have shown a strong, linear correlation between osmolarity and dry eye severity, as well as tight correlation with symptoms.22 Available on the market is a non-invasive, quick, simple, point-of-care tool for measuring tear osmolarity (TearLab Osmolarity, San Diego, CA, US)

Similarly, a simple-to-use, non-invasive, point-of-care test (InflammaDry Detector, RPS, Inc., Sarasota, FL, US) will be available to measure elevations in tear matrix metalloproteinase-9 levels, one of the most important inflammatory mediators that are increased in the tears of patients with OSD.

Figure 1: Meibography (Oculus Keratograph™)

Treatment

As discussed above, DES and MGD, and also conjuntivochalasia, are frequently present in patients pre-operatively. These conditions are often overlooked, because the symptoms or signs are mild and surgeons do not consider their presence. Nonetheless, they may disturb the tear film, which could negatively affect outcomes and the patient’s recovery.23,24

In this article, a practical guide is described to prepare patients before surgery and treatment recommendations after surgery.

Figure 2: Intraductal Meibomian Gland Probing

Pre-operative Treatment
In patients with DES and MGD, four actions as first-line treatment are recommended: local heat, mechanical massage, cleaning of the eyelids and topical antibiotics (azithromycin). In some cases patients can benefit from adjunctive therapy with anti-inflammatory drugs, especially topical cyclosporine (Restasis, Allergan, Inc.) that has been shown to have efficacy for both blepharitis and aqueous deficiency dry eye.25–27

In some cases with difficult MGD, intraductal meibomian gland probing (see Figure 2) is necessary to open blocked meibomian glands to improve the quality of the secretions and thus help to stabilise the tear film. In many cases, punctal plugs are a helpful complement to prepare these patients before surgery.

Demodex folliculorum is another condition to take in account. Little is known about the extent to which this microorganism can influence the pathophysiology of DGM as a vector for bacterial colonisation. Some authors recommend using washes with tea tree oil 50 %, and provide this treatment in the office because of the potential toxicity of this substance to the cornea.

Sex hormones (androgens) are known to play an important role in regulating the function of the meibomian glands, but no studies exist that demonstrate therapeutic benefit in the DGM.

When conjunctivochalasis is present and patients are symptomatic, it is necessary to evaluate two alternatives: medical treatment with lubricants or the need for surgery (to remove the folds of conjunctiva and especially fix the conjunctiva to the sclera with bioadhesive).

Post-operative Treatment
Quick identification of the problem is crucial. In most of our patients we start post-operative treatment OSD with preservative-free artificial tears during the day and artificial tear gels or lubricants at bedtime. In symptomatic patients we recommend topical cyclosporine or low-dose dexamethasone 0.01 %. and punctual plugs.

When MGD is present we recommend topical azithromycin, either alone or in combination with oral doxycycline, if tolerated. I also instruct these patients to use warm compresses and massage their eyelids. An artificial tear containing a lipid component can help to reduce evaporative tear loss in these patients.

Oral omega-3 fatty acids have been shown to be an effective complement in post-operative OSD. The omega-3 fatty acids improve the production of anti-inflammatory prostaglandins and the lipid component of the meibomian gland secretions28–30 helping to stabilise the tear film.

Patients who remain symptomatic despite aggressive therapy may benefit from preservative-free artificial tears. The use of autologous serum and moisture-chamber goggles are additional options for patients with severe DES.

Conclusion
Identifying and treating DES pre-operatively can help to avoid post-operative surprises. The early identification and treatment of postoperative DES will hasten patients’ recovery, prevent their frustration and enhance surgical outcomes.

Questionnaire
We conducted a questionnaire with 20 surgeons in cataract and refractive surgery, to enquire about the importance given to the presence of OSDs in patients having ocular surgery. We sought to get their opinion on whether they performed pre-treatment, if new technologies were employed and if they manage these concerns themselves or prefer to refer the patient to a specialist in OSD. The responses were predictable up to a point. All gave importance to the presence of OSD and their treatment pre- and post-surgery, but not all considered important new technologies; some do not treat the patients themselves, but would rather refer to another specialist. The final question looked at how surgeons believed ocular surface disorders affected the surgical outcomes. The mean score was 7.2 (scale given in question 5), which is a good score but we believe it is necessary to further raise awareness of the role that OSD plays in the success of cataract and refractive surgery among surgeons.

  1. Do you make some type of pre-operative study to rule out OSD before cataract or refractive surgery? 20/20: YES
  2. Do you consider the use of new technologies such as Dynamic Wavefront (sequential aberrometry between blinks), meibography, interferometry to study the tear film or confocal microscopy to study corneal inflammation necessary to analyse ocular surface before surgery? 12/20: YES
  3. If ocular surface disorders exist pre-operatively, do you use specific treatment before surgery? 20/20: YES
  4. As a cataract and refractive surgeon, do you manage the pre- and post-operative treatment yourself or do you prefer to refer to a specialist in OSD? 14/20: treat themselves and six surgeons refer patients to a specialist in OSDs.
  5. How do you think the presence of ocular surface disorders affect the outcomes of surgery, on a scale from 0 (no importance) to 10 (extremely important)? Mean: 7.2
2

References

  1. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007), Ocul Surf, 2007;5(2):75–92.
  2. The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the Epidemiology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007), Ocul Surf, 2007;5(2):93–107.
  3. Lemp MA, Advances in understanding and managing dry eye disease, Am J Ophthalmol, 2008;146:350–56.
  4. Preferred Practice Pattern, Dry Eye Syndrome, San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; September, 2008.
  5. Schein OD, Munoz B, Tielsch JM, et al., Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly, Am J Ophthalmol, 1997;124:723–8.
  6. Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Fukui Y, et al., Prevalence of dry eye in Japanese eye centers, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 1995;233:555–8.
  7. McCarty CA, Bansal AK, Livingston PM, et al., The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia, Ophthalmology, 1998;105:1114–19.
  8. Albietz JM, Dry eye: an update on clinical diagnosis, management and promising new treatments, Clin Exp Optom, 2001;84:4–18.
  9. Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ, et al., The International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: executive summary, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011;52:1922–9.
  10. Hardten DR, Dry eye disease in patients after cataract surgery, Cornea, 2008;27:885–6.
  11. Ram J, Gupta A, Brar GS, et al.,Outcomes of phacoemulsification in patients with dry eye, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002;28:1386–9.
  12. Donnenfeld E, Pflugflelder SC, Topical ophthalmic cyclosporine: pharmacology and clinical uses, Surv Ophthalmol, 2009;54:321–38.
  13. Toda I, LASIK and the ocular surface, Cornea, 2008;27(Suppl. 1):S70–S76.
  14. Lemp MA, Nichols KK, Blepharitis in the United States 2009:a survey-based perspective on prevalence and treatment, Ocul Surf, 2009;7(2 Suppl.):S1–S14.
  15. Korn BS, Kikkawa DO, Schanzlin DJ, Blepharoplasty in the post-laser in situ keratomileusis patient: preoperative considerations to avoid dry eye syndrome, Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007;119(7):2232–9.
  16. Liu Z, Luo L, Zhang Z, et al., Tear film changes after phacoemulsification [in Chinese], Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi, 2002;38(5):274–7.
  17. Salomao MQ, Ambrosio R Jr, Wilson SE, Dry eye associated with laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009;35(10):1756–60.
  18. Solomon R, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD, The effects of LASIK on the ocular surface, Ocul Surf, 2004;2(1):34–44.
  19. Toda I, Asano-Kato N, Komai-Hori Y, Tsubota K, Dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis, Am J Ophthalmol, 2001;132(1):1–7.
  20. Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease, Cornea, 2004;23:762–70.
  21. Ibrahim OM, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, et al., The efficacy, sensitivity, and specificity of in vivo laser confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction, Ophthalmology, 2010;117:665–72.
  22. Sullivan BD, Whitmer D, Nichols KK, et al., An objective approach to dry eye disease severity, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010;51:6125–30.
  23. Luchs J, Buznego C, Trattler W, Prevalence of blepharitis in patient scheduled for routine cataract surgery. Poster presented at ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, April 9–14, 2010, Boston, MA.
  24. Trattler W, Goldberg D, Reilly C, Incidence of concomitant cataract and dry eye: prospective health assessment of cataract patients. Presented at World Cornea Congress, 2010, Boston, MA.
  25. Perry HD, Doshi-Carnevale S, Donnenfeld ED, et al., Efficacy of commercially available topical cyclosporine A 0.05% in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction, Cornea, 2006;25(2);171–5.
  26. Donnenfeld ED, Soloman R, Roberts CW, et al., Cyclosporine 0.05% to improve visual outcomes after multifocal intraocular lens implantation, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010;36(7):1095–1100.
  27. Usea R, Purcell TL, Tan BU, et al., The effect of cyclosporine A (Restasis) on recovery of visual acuity following LASIK, J Refract Surg, 2008;24(5):473–6.
  28. Pinna A, Piccininni P, Carta F, Effect of oral linoleic and gamma linolenic acid on meibomian gland dysfunction, Cornea, 2007;26(3):260–64.
  29. Macsai MS, The role of omega-3 dietary supplementation in blepharitis and meibomian gland dysfunction, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 2008;106:336–56.
  30. Brown NA, Bron AJ, Harding JJ, Dewar HM, Nutrition supplements and the eye, Eye (Lond), 1998;12(Pt 1): 127–33
3

Article Information

Disclosure

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Carlos Vergés, C/Dalmases 42 08021 Barcelona, Spain. E: cverges@cverges.com

Received

2013-01-12T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup