Trending Topic

23 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Luke G Qin, Michael T Pierce, Rachel C Robbins

The uvea is a vascular stratum that includes the iris, ciliary body and choroid. Uveitis is defined as inflammation of a part of the uvea or its entirety, but it is also used to describe inflammatory processes of any part of the eye, such as the vitreous or peripheral retina. The clinical taxonomy of uveitis […]

2 mins

Glaucoma Pharmacogenetics

Georg Mossböck, Christoph Faschinger
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: May 22nd 2012 European Ophthalmic Review, 2012;6(3):146–8 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/EOR.2012.06.03.146
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

An individuals’ reaction to a specific drug is influenced by various factors including environmental, systemic and genetic factors. In most cases the reactions of a group of individuals are of the Gaussian type with non- to low responders at the lower end of the curve and high- to ultra-high responders at the upper end of the curve. As these extraordinary reactions to a drug are at least partly genetically determined pharmacogenetics is set to decipher the underlying genetic constitution and to establish an individualised genotype-based drug therapy. Candidate genes in pharmacogenetics include genes of receptors as well as their downstream pathway and genes of drug metabolising or activating enzymes. Most prominent examples from the medical literature are warfarin, clopidogrel and various psychotropic and oncological drugs. Regarding glaucoma therapy studies investigating the role of polymorphisms in the genes of β-adrenergic receptors, the important metabolising enzyme CYP2D6 and the prostaglandin F2α receptor have been performed. Results of these studies are presented and an outlook on the role of pharmocogenetics in glaucoma therapy will be provided.

Keywords

Glaucoma, pharmacogenetics, betablocker, prostaglandin analogues

2

Article

The effect of a drug in terms of desired effects and undesired side-effects on an individual basis is still not 100 % predictable.1 Undoubtedly, this prediction would be a great advantage for patients’ safety and societies’ economies and therefore, it has been subject to research ever since drugs have been used in a scientific manner.2

It is well known that an individuals’ response to a certain drug is influenced by extrinsic as well as intrinsic factors.3 Among the extrinsic factors there are lifestyle issues like diet, alcohol consumption or nicotine abuse and geographical factors. Intrinsic factors comprise constant factors like age, sex, ethnic group and, more specifically, the colour of the iris, but also modifiable ones like the body mass index or concomitant systemic or ocular disease. Furthermore, the personal genetic constitution determines at least partially the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a drug. Polymorphic receptors or their downstream pathway targets may aggravate or attenuate the effects of a drug, whereas variants of metabolising or activating enzymes can lead to increased or decreased levels of a drug. The aim of pharmacogenetics is to describe these polymorphisms and their impact on an individuals’ reaction to a specific drug. As pharmacogenetic research started about 30 years ago, pharmacogenetic data on a range of drugs have now been reported.4

Today, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lists pharmocogenetic biomarkers in drug labels for more than 100 drugs, most of them anticancer or psychiatric drugs.5 For example, warfarin dose is greatly influenced by the genotype of the metabolising enzyme CYP2C9 and the genotype of the target enzyme vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC1), which together account for roughly 40 % of the interindividual variance of warfarin dose.6 CYP2D6 is necessary for about 25 % of all drugs metabolised in the human liver, including various psychiatric drugs and beta-blockers.7

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Wilffert B, Swen J, Mulder H, et al., KNMP working group
    Pharmacogenetics. From evidence based medicine to
    mechanism based medicine. Reviewing the role of
    pharmacogenetics, Int J Clin Pharm, 2011;33:3–9.

  2. Daly AK, Individualized drug therapy, Curr Opin Drug Discov
    Devel, 2007;10:29–36.

  3. Liebler DC, Guengerich FP, Elucidating mechanisms of
    drug-induced toxicity, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2005;4:410–20.

  4. Zhou SF, Di YM, Chan E, et al., Clinical pharmacogenetics
    and potential application in personalized medicine,
    Curr Drug Metab, 2008;9:738–84.

  5. Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labels,
    2012. Available at: www.fda.gov/drugs/scienceresearch/
    researchareas/pharmacogenetics/ucm083378.htm
    (accessed April 10, 2012).

  6. Klein TE, Altman RB, Eriksson N, et al., Estimation of the
    warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data,
    N Engl J Med, 2009 19;360:753–64.

  7. Cascorbi I, Pharmacogenetics of cytochrome p4502D6:
    genetic background and clinical implication, Eur J Clin Invest,
    2003;33:S17–22.

  8. Kirchheiner J, Schmidt H, Tzvetkov M, et al.,
    Pharmacokinetics of codeine and its metabolite morphine
    in ultra-rapid metabolizers due to CYP2D6 duplication,
    Pharmacogenomics J, 2007;7:257–65.

  9. Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al., Cytochrome p-450
    polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel, N Engl J Med,
    2009;360:354–62.

  10. Brantley MA Jr, Fang AM, King JM, et al., Association of
    complement factor H and LOC387715 genotypes with
    response of exudative age-related macular degeneration to
    intravitreal bevacizumab, Ophthalmology, 2007;114:2168–73.

  11. Lee AY, Raya AK, Kymes SM, et al., Pharmacogenetics of
    complement factor H (Y402H) and treatment of exudative
    age-related macular degeneration with ranibizumab,
    Br J Ophthalmol, 2009;93:610–3.

  12. Camras CB, Hedman K, US Latanoprost Study Group. Rate
    of response to latanoprost or timolol in patients with ocular
    hypertension or glaucoma, J Glaucoma, 2003;12:466–9.

  13. Choplin N, Bernstein P, Batoosingh AL, Whitcup SM,
    Bimatoprost/Latanoprost Study Group. A randomized,
    investigator-masked comparison of diurnal responder
    rates with bimatoprost and latanoprost in the lowering
    of intraocular pressure, Surv Ophthalmol,
    2004;49:S19–25.

  14. Rossetti L, Gandolfi S, Traverso C, et al., An evaluation of
    the rate of nonresponders to latanoprost therapy, J
    Glaucoma, 2006;15:238–43.

  15. Aung T, Chew PT, Yip CC, et al., A randomized doublemasked
    crossover study comparing latanoprost 0.005%
    with unoprostone 0.12 % in patients with primary openangle
    glaucoma and ocular hypertension, Am J Ophthalmol,
    2001;131:636–42.

  16. Waldock A, Snape J, Graham CM, Effects of glaucoma
    medications on the cardiorespiratory and intraocular
    pressure status of newly diagnosed glaucoma patients,
    Br J Ophthalmol, 2000;84:710–3.

  17. Wax MB, Molinoff PB, Distribution and properties of betaadrenergic
    receptors in human iris-ciliary body,
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1987;28(3):420–30.

  18. Volotinen M, Turpeinen M, Tolonen A, et al., Timolol
    metabolism in human liver microsomes is mediated
    principally by CYP2D6, Drug Metab Dispos, 2007;35:1135–41.

  19. Mason DA, Moore JD, Green SA, Liggett SB, A gain-offunction
    polymorphism in a G-protein coupling domain of
    the human beta1-adrenergic receptor, J Biol Chem,
    1999;274:12670–4.

  20. Bengtsson K, Melander O, Orho-Melander M, et al.,
    Polymorphism in the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor gene and
    hypertension, Circulation, 2001;104:187–90.

  21. Levin MC, Marullo S, Muntaner O, et al., The myocardiumprotective
    Gly-49 variant of the beta 1-adrenergic receptor
    exhibits constitutive activity and increased desensitization
    and down-regulation, J Biol Chem, 2002;277:30429–35.

  22. Schwartz SG, Puckett BJ, Allen RC, et al., Beta1-adrenergic
    receptor polymorphisms and clinical efficacy of betaxolol
    hydrochloride in normal volunteers, Ophthalmology,
    2005;112:2131–6.

  23. McCarty CA, Burmester JK, Mukesh BN, et al., Intraocular
    pressure response to topical beta-blockers associated with
    an ADRB2 single-nucleotide polymorphism, Arch Ophthalmol,
    2008;126:959–63.

  24. Nieminen T, Uusitalo H, Mäenpää J, et al., Polymorphisms
    of genes CYP2D6, ADRB1 and GNAS1 in pharmacokinetics
    and systemic effects of ophthalmic timolol. A pilot study,
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2005;61:811–9.

  25. Green SA, Turki J, Innis M, Liggett SB, Amino-terminal
    polymorphisms of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor
    impart distinct agonist-promoted regulatory properties,
    Biochemistry, 1994;33:9414–9.

  26. Brodde OE, Leineweber K, Beta2-adrenoceptor gene
    polymorphisms, Pharmacogenet Genomics, 2005;15:267–75.

  27. Fuchsjager-Mayrl G, Markovic O, Losert D, et al.,
    Polymorphism of the beta-2 adrenoceptor and IOP lowering
    potency of topical timolol in healthy subjects, Mol Vis,
    2005;11:811–5.

  28. The Human Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Allele Nomenclature
    Database: CYP2D6 allele nomenclature, 2011. Available at:
    www.cypalleles.ki.se/cyp2d6.htm (accessed 11 April 2012).

  29. Yuan H, Yu M, Yang Y, et al., Association of CYP2D6 singlenucleotide
    polymorphism with response to ophthalmic
    timolol in primary open-angle Glaucoma–a pilot study,
    J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2010;26:497–501.

  30. Stjernschantz J, Selén G, Sjöquist B, Resul B, Preclinical
    pharmacology of latanoprost, a phenyl-substituted PGF2
    alpha analogue, Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Leukot Res,
    1995;23:513–8.

  31. Sakurai M, Higashide T, Takahashi M, Sugiyama K,
    Association between genetic polymorphisms of the
    prostaglandin F2alpha receptor gene and response to
    latanoprost, Ophthalmology, 2007;114:1039–45.

  32. Flockhart DA, Skaar T, Berlin DS, et al., Clinically available
    pharmacogenomics tests, Clin Pharmacol Ther,
    2009;86:109–13.

  33. Chalkidou K, Rawlins SM, Pharmacogenetics and costeffectiveness
    analysis: a two-way street, Drug Discov Today,
    2011;16:873–7.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Georg Mossböck, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036 Graz, Austria. E: g.mossboeck@medunigraz.at

Received

2012-11-11T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup